<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Space Task Force</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spacetaskforce.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spacetaskforce.com</link>
	<description>Discussion and analysis of the aerospace industry from those that know it best.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 21:53:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on STF Video; STS-130 Rollout to Pad by STS-130, First of the Final Five Launches &#171; Space Task Force</title>
		<link>http://spacetaskforce.com/2010/01/07/stf-video-sts-130-rollout-to-pad/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[STS-130, First of the Final Five Launches &#171; Space Task Force]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 21:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spacetaskforce.wordpress.com/2010/01/07/stf-video-sts-130-rollout-to-pad#comment-21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Stay tuned to the Space Task Force as we continue our extended mission coverage of STS-130 from rollout to the pad to rollout on the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stay tuned to the Space Task Force as we continue our extended mission coverage of STS-130 from rollout to the pad to rollout on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on STS-130 Scrub by STS-130, First of the Final Five Launches &#171; Space Task Force</title>
		<link>http://spacetaskforce.com/2010/02/07/sts-130-scrub/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[STS-130, First of the Final Five Launches &#171; Space Task Force]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 21:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spacetaskforce.wordpress.com/2010/02/07/sts-130-scrub#comment-20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] low-lying clouds scrubbed the first attempt, STS-130 took off at 4:14 am in what is scheduled to be the last night launch of a space shuttle. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] low-lying clouds scrubbed the first attempt, STS-130 took off at 4:14 am in what is scheduled to be the last night launch of a space shuttle. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on STF Episode 20: New York Party by kevin_in_michigan</title>
		<link>http://spacetaskforce.com/2008/01/31/stf-episode-20-new-york-party/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kevin_in_michigan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spacetaskforce.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/stf-episode-20-new-york-party/#comment-19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for answering my comment about your previous treatment of politics and space. Good answers, too. Kudos.Please continue to cover proposed legislation and candidate positions as they relate to space on the podcast.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for answering my comment about your previous treatment of politics and space. Good answers, too. Kudos.Please continue to cover proposed legislation and candidate positions as they relate to space on the podcast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on STF Episode 20: New York Party by kevin_in_michigan</title>
		<link>http://spacetaskforce.com/2008/01/31/stf-episode-20-new-york-party/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kevin_in_michigan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spacetaskforce.wordpress.com/2008/01/31/stf-episode-20-new-york-party/#comment-10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for answering my comment about your previous treatment of politics and space. Good answers, too. Kudos.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Please continue to cover proposed legislation and candidate positions as they relate to space on the podcast.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for answering my comment about your previous treatment of politics and space. Good answers, too. Kudos.</p>
<p>Please continue to cover proposed legislation and candidate positions as they relate to space on the podcast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Politics meets the High Frontier by kevin_in_michigan</title>
		<link>http://spacetaskforce.com/2007/12/04/politics-meets-the-high-frontier/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kevin_in_michigan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 07:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spacetaskforce.wordpress.com/2007/12/04/politics-meets-the-high-frontier/#comment-18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First ... &quot;some people say?&quot; Come on! You can do better than &quot;some people say that Reagan won the cold war because...&quot; Either that&#039;s what YOU say and should quit pretending otherwise or you can tell us WHO says and we can judge the  credibility of the information based on what we know of the person who says. Also, I would challenge anyone who says what you said &quot;some people say&quot; because it&#039;s hogwash. I certainly wouldn&#039;t propose such a marginal notion in a politically neutral venue.Second... &quot;Republicans are pretty much on board with the vision...&quot; Excuse me? Which Republicans? How do you know? What have they said, exactly? You carried on at length about Obama, and mentioned Clinton, but when it came to any of the other Democrats you didn&#039;t mention anything and you painted all Republicans with a &quot;pro-space&quot; brush. Does give one the impression you ARE taking sides. I don&#039;t know what the any of the R&#039;s stand on space is, but I do know their stand son taxes are, which one would think might have baring on spending, as in, NASA&#039;s budget!Last... if you&#039;re going to talk about politics then why don&#039;t you focus on where the real power is when it comes to NASA, which is in the Congress who control spending. All the pres can do is make suggestions (budget proposal), advocate and veto. The legislature is what is really important.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First &#8230; &#8220;some people say?&#8221; Come on! You can do better than &#8220;some people say that Reagan won the cold war because&#8230;&#8221; Either that&#8217;s what YOU say and should quit pretending otherwise or you can tell us WHO says and we can judge the  credibility of the information based on what we know of the person who says. Also, I would challenge anyone who says what you said &#8220;some people say&#8221; because it&#8217;s hogwash. I certainly wouldn&#8217;t propose such a marginal notion in a politically neutral venue.Second&#8230; &#8220;Republicans are pretty much on board with the vision&#8230;&#8221; Excuse me? Which Republicans? How do you know? What have they said, exactly? You carried on at length about Obama, and mentioned Clinton, but when it came to any of the other Democrats you didn&#8217;t mention anything and you painted all Republicans with a &#8220;pro-space&#8221; brush. Does give one the impression you ARE taking sides. I don&#8217;t know what the any of the R&#8217;s stand on space is, but I do know their stand son taxes are, which one would think might have baring on spending, as in, NASA&#8217;s budget!Last&#8230; if you&#8217;re going to talk about politics then why don&#8217;t you focus on where the real power is when it comes to NASA, which is in the Congress who control spending. All the pres can do is make suggestions (budget proposal), advocate and veto. The legislature is what is really important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Politics meets the High Frontier by kevin_in_michigan</title>
		<link>http://spacetaskforce.com/2007/12/04/politics-meets-the-high-frontier/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kevin_in_michigan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 07:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spacetaskforce.wordpress.com/2007/12/04/politics-meets-the-high-frontier/#comment-9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First ... &quot;some people say?&quot; Come on! You can do better than &quot;some people say that Reagan won the cold war because...&quot; Either that&#039;s what YOU say and should quit pretending otherwise or you can tell us WHO says and we can judge the  credibility of the information based on what we know of the person who says. Also, I would challenge anyone who says what you said &quot;some people say&quot; because it&#039;s hogwash. I certainly wouldn&#039;t propose such a marginal notion in a politically neutral venue.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Second... &quot;Republicans are pretty much on board with the vision...&quot; Excuse me? Which Republicans? How do you know? What have they said, exactly? You carried on at length about Obama, and mentioned Clinton, but when it came to any of the other Democrats you didn&#039;t mention anything and you painted all Republicans with a &quot;pro-space&quot; brush. Does give one the impression you ARE taking sides. I don&#039;t know what the any of the R&#039;s stand on space is, but I do know their stand son taxes are, which one would think might have baring on spending, as in, NASA&#039;s budget!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Last... if you&#039;re going to talk about politics then why don&#039;t you focus on where the real power is when it comes to NASA, which is in the Congress who control spending. All the pres can do is make suggestions (budget proposal), advocate and veto. The legislature is what is really important.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First &#8230; &#8220;some people say?&#8221; Come on! You can do better than &#8220;some people say that Reagan won the cold war because&#8230;&#8221; Either that&#8217;s what YOU say and should quit pretending otherwise or you can tell us WHO says and we can judge the  credibility of the information based on what we know of the person who says. Also, I would challenge anyone who says what you said &#8220;some people say&#8221; because it&#8217;s hogwash. I certainly wouldn&#8217;t propose such a marginal notion in a politically neutral venue.</p>
<p>Second&#8230; &#8220;Republicans are pretty much on board with the vision&#8230;&#8221; Excuse me? Which Republicans? How do you know? What have they said, exactly? You carried on at length about Obama, and mentioned Clinton, but when it came to any of the other Democrats you didn&#8217;t mention anything and you painted all Republicans with a &#8220;pro-space&#8221; brush. Does give one the impression you ARE taking sides. I don&#8217;t know what the any of the R&#8217;s stand on space is, but I do know their stand son taxes are, which one would think might have baring on spending, as in, NASA&#8217;s budget!</p>
<p>Last&#8230; if you&#8217;re going to talk about politics then why don&#8217;t you focus on where the real power is when it comes to NASA, which is in the Congress who control spending. All the pres can do is make suggestions (budget proposal), advocate and veto. The legislature is what is really important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on STF Episode 13: We&#8217;re Back by Tim</title>
		<link>http://spacetaskforce.com/2007/08/17/stf-episode-13-were-back/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 20:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spacetaskforce.wordpress.com/2007/08/17/stf-episode-13-were-back/#comment-17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just got word that this post is liked to NASA Watch.  The article talks more about the NASA communications strategy and where it is flawed.  Click the link above to read the article.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just got word that this post is liked to NASA Watch.  The article talks more about the NASA communications strategy and where it is flawed.  Click the link above to read the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on STF Episode 13: We&#8217;re Back by Tim</title>
		<link>http://spacetaskforce.com/2007/08/17/stf-episode-13-were-back/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 20:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spacetaskforce.wordpress.com/2007/08/17/stf-episode-13-were-back/#comment-8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just got word that this post is liked to &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.nasawatch.com/archives/2007/08/i_guess_nasa_no.html&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NASA Watch&lt;/a&gt;.  The article talks more about the NASA communications strategy and where it is flawed.  Click the link above to read the article.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just got word that this post is liked to <a HREF="http://www.nasawatch.com/archives/2007/08/i_guess_nasa_no.html" REL="nofollow">NASA Watch</a>.  The article talks more about the NASA communications strategy and where it is flawed.  Click the link above to read the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on STF12: A Rough Week by George</title>
		<link>http://spacetaskforce.com/2007/07/27/stf12-a-rough-week-2/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[George]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 12:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spacetaskforce.wordpress.com/2007/07/27/stf12-a-rough-week-2#comment-16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you. It&#039;s appreciated. Please let us know if there are any topics you&#039;d like for us to cover.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you. It&#8217;s appreciated. Please let us know if there are any topics you&#8217;d like for us to cover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on STF12: A Rough Week by George</title>
		<link>http://spacetaskforce.com/2007/07/27/stf12-a-rough-week/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[George]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 12:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spacetaskforce.wordpress.com/2007/07/27/stf12-a-rough-week/#comment-7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you. It&#039;s appreciated. Please let us know if there are any topics you&#039;d like for us to cover.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you. It&#8217;s appreciated. Please let us know if there are any topics you&#8217;d like for us to cover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

